Sunday, October 3, 2010

Milena Velba En Streaming

acquisition in the company to send these copies available to all

these copies available
Weekend in November 2010 at the request of our friends galleros in Colombia and abroad, this time chickens and roosters in replum if you ask most will also come available here in this page, if you want to see new videos just click on the link should give http://www.youtube.com/user/CriaderodelosZorro # p/a/u/1/ofCUKw3cqUo greetings to all the public that we still Venezuela, Ecuador and Panama.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Thick White Discharge 6 Days Before Periods




"The influence of environment seems to be printed in the structure of the brain, which in turn shapes the environment "

"The possible lessons for modern cultures is clear . We seem to be suffering from failures in the family ties, reflected in everything from divorce rates of sexual crimes, alcoholism and drug abuse. "
-James W. Prescott -


few years ago and since I read this article, I was very shocked and still does to read it again, especially the thought experiments that took place by the analyst Harry Harlow in the price they had to pay for these poor babies monkeys, suffering scheduled, alienation of affection, which later proved, to realize what is happening in our human species, the alienation of the affection



Harry Harlow, John Bowlby , Mary Ainsworth, James and Joyce Robertson , Wilhelm Reich, Michel Odent and many others who started scientific work to discover the devastating effects it can have this alienation of affection human creatures in its primal stage.



More and more independent researchers, unfortunately little known, little-publicized in various fields of science that are bringing more and more data about the terrible consequences in brain structure ( 1) and its disastrous impact in individuals and thus in society, because of this alienation of affection has become culture and unfortunately is the tendency of our modern civilization robot.

One of the great scientists is JAMES W. PRESCOTT , which for decades has been working hard to make known their findings also confirm other research on Origins of Human Violence .


ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

By James W. Prescott

Deprived of their mothers, Harry Harlow's monkeys (2) were some sometimes apathetic, sometimes hyperactive and were outbursts of violence. Raised in isolation, were socially inept, frequently hugged and shook themselves as autistic children.


What

Harlow could not know at the time of his dramatic experiments between the 1950s and 1960s, was that these behavioral disorders were accompanied by brain damage .

more recent studies suggest that during the training periods of brain growth, certain types of sensory deprivation, as the lack of skin contact and the rocking by the mother - results in an incomplete development or damage to the neural systems that control the condition (eg loss of the branches of neurons called dendrites). Since these systems influence the brain centers associated with violence, in a mutual inhibitory mechanism, the child deprived of affection may have difficulty controlling violent impulses when they are adults.

If confirmed, these studies could have profound implications for the human cultures that raise their creatures with low levels of skin contact and movement. The creatures in these societies may be disabled to experience certain kinds of pleasure-and be predisposed to apathy and violence.

riots, I think, have their origins in the somatosensory system of the cerebellum, which regulates the direction of movement and balance (vestibular system) and the sense of touch. (Somestético system). More than other senses such as sight and hearing, touch and seem movement directly linked to emotions such as condition. And this portion of the brain is one of the most susceptible to "model", changes in neuronal structure, during the development of children . In numerous studies of laboratory animals deprived of tactile stimulation and motion have exhibited abnormal social and emotional behavior.

Harlow explained that the behavior of monkeys is simply caused by social isolation and deprivation not in a specific sense of neurobiological processes.

I began to suspect that the cerebellar-vestibular system was involved after a study by psychoanalysts William Mason and Gershon Berkson, who reported that when a garment "surrogate mother" not rocked a monkey infant, maternal deprivation syndrome not developed. To study this possibility, Robert Heath and Bernard Saltzburg medical school took Tulane University, the monkeys provided by Harlow, monkeys reared with extreme violence and extreme isolation, electrophysiological recordings, via electrodes implanted in the cerebellum and limbic regions. Bioelectric signals from these electrodes showed on screen Download "peak" abnormal, which was not seen in normal monkeys. The presence of the peak was also detected by a single computer analysis of EEG records from the scalp of these monkeys in the cerebellum and limbic regions.

much evidence was provided of the role of the cerebellum, in a study I did with AJBerman and Doreen Berman Veterans Administration Hospital in the Bronx in New York. Using

two violent monkeys Harlow, Berman surgery removed part of the outer layers of the cortex of the "old brain" (paleocerebellum region) in a monkey and the "new brain (neocerebellum region) in the other. The monkey with the injury in the "old brain" became much less violent, while the mono with the new brain injury not. This result makes sense: old brain cerebellum connected primarily to the emotional centers in the limbic system, while the new brain region connected primarily to the governing structures very highly neocortical brain processes.

Meanwhile, Austin Riese University of California, Riverside showed that l monkeys raised in isolation you have a larger difference in the branches of brain cells of somatosensory and motor cortex . And at the University of Illinois, Mary Wiliam Floeter and Greenough found that monkeys raised in colonies had more branches of brain cells in parts of the cerebellum that Esther monkeys reared in isolation or in pairs.

Thus the influence of environment seems to be printed in the structure of the brain, which in turn shapes the environment, (I call this proposal to study "ecobiology" of behavior to distinguish it from the socio- biology)

Moreover, cross-cultural studies have established a significant relationship between physical condition demonstrated in human infants and rates of violence among adults. In a study of 49 primitive cultures (3) , found that when levels of affection to the infant are low-and among the Comanches and Ashanti, the levels of violence are high ; where physical condition is high -as among the Maori of New Zealand and the Balinese-violence is low . also found that restrictions on premarital sexual involvement were associated with high violence.

The possible lesson to modern culture is clear. We seem to be suffering from failures in the family ties, reflected in everything from divorce rates of sex crime, alcoholism and drug abuse.

culture depends on our neurobiology, without a physical condition suitable environment, a harmonious society would not be possible.


Psichology Today
Reprinted from December 1979 James W. Prescott WAS
formerly Health Scientist Administrator, Developmental Biology Program Behaviohal. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Health.
March / April 1989

Translated by the author of this blog, original version, English _______________________________________________________________


Notes:

(1) psychoanalyst Elliott Barker section "The Brain" course "The Art of Parenting", clearly describes the brain damage occurs in creatures, for lack of affection or abuse.

(2) Harry Harlow was an American psychoanalyst who performed experiments with baby rhesus monkeys studied the impact of isolation and deprivation of the mother during the primal period.

(3) studies James W. Prescott were later confirmed 100%. The bulletin: body pleasure and the origins of violence , is published on its website .

"The correlation between lack bodily love in childhood and violence was shown by JWPrescott in 1975, and the correlation between the degree of sexual freedom for women (which is associated with primary love ) and the degree of violence. This study was conducted in 49 non-industrialized countries, Prescott obtaining a correlation of 98%, a further review of the study showed that Prescott was mistaken and that the correlation was 100%. This means that there is a zero percent chance that a human being from birth libidinally satisfied to be a violent person. This correlation has subsequently been found in neurological terms: first, it was found that l to formation of the neurological system from 14/16 weeks of gestation is not genetically patterned and depends on the libidinal relationship with the environment , and secondly, that adaptation of this system in training, you can either develop the capacity for empathy or the capacity for indifference and cruelty, by type creature's interaction with its environment . This is how neurologically has also proven that a freezing environment libidinal develops creatures prone to violence. (Casilda Rodrigáñez in Degeneration of the human race by the loss of their fundamental qualities )


sources of information

Video on the Origins of Violence

The qualities of the human creature

Female Sexuality

"maternal instinct or desire?

Patriarchate Project

The paradigm of women

Impact of Mother-Baby Separation

matricide and therapeutic status

Manifesto for the recovery of motherhood

Saturday, April 3, 2010

How To Lock The Bag Number

Alienation of Affection The roots of horror in the crib



by Alice Miller


There

in any dictator, murderer or terrorist, however daunting it is and without any exception, a child who was once severely beaten, and who, to survive, had to completely deny their feelings of utter helplessness . But this radical denial of the suffering endured behaved in an empty interior, and in many of these beings, an arrest of development of the innate capacity for compassion .

Destroying human life, including themselves, reduced to the state of emptiness, do not cause any problems.


Today we can find on the computer screens lesions in the brain of children destroyed care or private. Numerous articles in specialist brain research, among others Bruce D. Perry, who is also child psychologist, provide us with valuable information on this topic.


Contrary to what you believed until recently, we do not come into this world with a brain fully formed: it develops during the first years of life, and that one does to the child during this period, in good as in evil, often leaves indelible marks. Because our brain keeps the body and emotional memory, though, unfortunately! mental-not necessarily all that has happened . If the creature has, by his side, a person able to help, he learns to magnify what is known: the cruelty, brutality, hypocrisy and ignorance. Because the child only learns by imitation, and not absorb what you're looking to instill with beautiful well-intentioned words. Later, one that will be grown without support from someone that security will become an instigator of the massacres, mass death, the Mafia godfather or dictator, exercise, or help to carry on entire populations, once the will to power, the same terror that it met and personally suffered as a child.


Monday, January 18, 2010

Konad Where To Buy New York




"Humans are born to live, live and love as if they were the same thing. Affect is a fundamental need is the need makes us human. Hence, a person who has not been 'humanised' during the first six years of his life suffering from a process of dehumanization that leads them to destructive behaviors, learned in a messy and misguided attempt to adapt to a world too cluttered and provoking tension. Of these disorders arise all the aggressiveness and violent clashes at both individual and collective "
Ashley Montagu (The myth of human violence)



In the year 1986 at a UNESCO meeting in Seville, Spain, to mark the International Year of Peace, 19 scientists from India, Finland, Spain, Mexico, United States, Kuwait, United Kingdom , Germany, Russia, Australia, Poland and Kenya.
Belonging to different branches of science such as neurophysiology, psychology, ethology, social psychology, physical anthropology, psychiatry, biochemistry, psychobiology, animal behavior, biological anthropology, psychology, sociology.

signed the following (1) :



STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE


In the belief that it is our responsibility to speak out from our disciplines on the most dangerous and destructive activities of the species, violence and war, recognizing that science is a cultural product that can not be defined or cover everything, and grateful for the support sevillanas authorities and representatives of the English Committee of UNESCO; we the undersigned, scientists around the world and relevant science specialists have met and reached the following Statement on Violence. It put into question a number of alleged biological findings used even by some in our disciplines, to justify violence and war . Because these alleged findings have contributed to an atmosphere of pessimism in our time, we propose that this rejection abienrto and thought of such errors contribute significantly to the International Year of Peace.


Misuse of scientific theories and data as justification for violence and war is not new , but have occurred since the advent of modern science. For example, the theory of evolution has been used to justify not only war but also genocide, colonialism, and suppression of the weak .

formulate our proposal in the form of five proposals. We are aware that there are many other issues about violence and war which could be applied fruitfully in terms of our disciplines, but we confine ourselves here to what we regard as the first and most important step.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that we inherited from our animal ancestors tendency to make war . Although the fights are common in all animal species, few cases of destruction among species organized groups are known and none includes the use of tools developed as weapons. The predators that normally feed on other species could not be equated with violence in the species. War is a peculiar human phenomenon and does not occur among the other animals .

The fact that the war has changed so radically over time indicates that it is a product of culture. Its biological connection takes place essentially through language, which allows the coordination of groups, transfer of technology and tools. War is biologically possible, but inevitable, as evidenced by its variations in time and in space. There are cultures that have waged war for hundreds of years and there are others who have engaged in frequent struggles times and not others.


IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that war or other violent behavior are genetically programmed into our human nature . While genes affect all levels Nervis system function, providing a potential development that can only be updated jointly by the ecological and social environment. While the individual varies in their predisposition to be affected by his experience, is the interaction between their genetic endowment and rearing conditions which determine their personality . Except for rare pathologies, the genes do not produce individuals necessarily predisposed to violence. Do they determine otherwise. While genes are involved with each other to establish our performance capabilities, do not determine the outcome for themselves.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that in the course of human evolution has been a selection of aggressive behavior more than other behaviors . In all well-studied species, status within the group is achieved with the ability to cooperate and fulfill social functions relevant to the structure of that group.
The "dominance" implies social ties and affiliations, it is not simply a matter of possession and use of greater physical strength, although it involves aggressive behavior. Where genetic selection for aggressive behavior has been imposed artificially in animals, has quickly produced hyper-aggressive individuals, indicating that the attack was not selected the most natural conditions.
When such hyper-aggressive animals, created experimentally are in a social group, or disrupt its social structure or are thrown out of it. Violence is our evolutionary legacy nor in our genes.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that humans possess a "violent brain" . While we have the nervous system able to act violently, it is not automatically activated by external or internal stimuli. As higher primates, but unlike other animals, our higher neural processes, filter such stimuli before they are made. There is nothing in our neurophysiology that compels us to react violently .


IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that war has its origins in the 'instinct' or any other motivation simple. The emergence of modern warfare has been a journey from the primacy of emotional and motivational factors, sometimes called "instincts" - to the primacy of cognitive factors. Modern war involves institutional use of personal caracaterísticas such as obedience, suggestibility or idealism, social skills like language, and rational considerations such as cost estimates, planning and reporting process. technology of modern war has exaggerated traits associated with violence, both in training fighters in the preparation of support for the war among the general population. As a result of this exaggeration, such features often are interpreted as causes and consequences of the process not as .

conclude
saying that biology does not condemn humanity to war, and that humanity can be freed from the bondage of biological pessimism and now equipped with the confidence necessary to perform the processing tasks required in this International Year of Peace and the years come. Although these tasks are mainly institutional and collective, also based in the consciousness of individual participants for whom pessimism and optimism are essential. As "wars begin in the minds of men ', peace also begins in our minds. The same species who invented war is capable of inventing peace. The responsibility lies with each one of us.

Seville, May 16, 1986



LIST Scientists subscribers


David Adams, Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown (CT), U.S.. SA Barnett, Ethology. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

NPBETCHEREVA, Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad, USSR.

Bonnie Frank Carter, Psychology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia (PA), U.S..

Joseph M. Rodriguez Delgado, Neurophysiology, Center for Neurobiological Studies, Madrid, Spain

Andrzej Eliasz, Single Differences Psychology. Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. SANTIAGO

GENOVES, Biological Anthropology, Institute of Anthropological Studies, Mexico City, Mexico. JOSE LUIS DIAZ

, Ethology, Mexican Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.

E. BENSON GINSBURG, Behavioral Genetics, University of Connecticut, Storr (CT), USA. JO

Groebel, Social Psychology, Errziehungswissens-chaftliche Hochschule, Landau, Germany.

-SAMIR KUMAR GHOSH, Sociology, Indian Institute of Human Sciences, Calcutta, India.

Robert Hinde, Animal Behavior, University of Cambridge, UK.
RICHARD E.
LEAKEY, Physical Anthropology, National Museum of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. TAH

H. MALAYSIA, Psychiatry, University of Kuwait

MARTIN J. RAMIREZ, Psychobiology, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.

Federico Mayor Zaragoza, Biochemistry, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain. DIANA L.

MENDOZA, Etiology, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.

Ashis Nandy, Political Psychology, Center for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi, India.

JOHN PAUL SCOTT, Animal Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green (OH), USA. Riitta

Walstrom, Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

English Original: English Translation of the Commission.


----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Notes
:

(1 ) Retrieving Information from Texts Casilda Rodrigáñez Bustos.