Friday, April 30, 2010

Thick White Discharge 6 Days Before Periods




"The influence of environment seems to be printed in the structure of the brain, which in turn shapes the environment "

"The possible lessons for modern cultures is clear . We seem to be suffering from failures in the family ties, reflected in everything from divorce rates of sexual crimes, alcoholism and drug abuse. "
-James W. Prescott -


few years ago and since I read this article, I was very shocked and still does to read it again, especially the thought experiments that took place by the analyst Harry Harlow in the price they had to pay for these poor babies monkeys, suffering scheduled, alienation of affection, which later proved, to realize what is happening in our human species, the alienation of the affection



Harry Harlow, John Bowlby , Mary Ainsworth, James and Joyce Robertson , Wilhelm Reich, Michel Odent and many others who started scientific work to discover the devastating effects it can have this alienation of affection human creatures in its primal stage.



More and more independent researchers, unfortunately little known, little-publicized in various fields of science that are bringing more and more data about the terrible consequences in brain structure ( 1) and its disastrous impact in individuals and thus in society, because of this alienation of affection has become culture and unfortunately is the tendency of our modern civilization robot.

One of the great scientists is JAMES W. PRESCOTT , which for decades has been working hard to make known their findings also confirm other research on Origins of Human Violence .


ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

By James W. Prescott

Deprived of their mothers, Harry Harlow's monkeys (2) were some sometimes apathetic, sometimes hyperactive and were outbursts of violence. Raised in isolation, were socially inept, frequently hugged and shook themselves as autistic children.


What

Harlow could not know at the time of his dramatic experiments between the 1950s and 1960s, was that these behavioral disorders were accompanied by brain damage .

more recent studies suggest that during the training periods of brain growth, certain types of sensory deprivation, as the lack of skin contact and the rocking by the mother - results in an incomplete development or damage to the neural systems that control the condition (eg loss of the branches of neurons called dendrites). Since these systems influence the brain centers associated with violence, in a mutual inhibitory mechanism, the child deprived of affection may have difficulty controlling violent impulses when they are adults.

If confirmed, these studies could have profound implications for the human cultures that raise their creatures with low levels of skin contact and movement. The creatures in these societies may be disabled to experience certain kinds of pleasure-and be predisposed to apathy and violence.

riots, I think, have their origins in the somatosensory system of the cerebellum, which regulates the direction of movement and balance (vestibular system) and the sense of touch. (Somestético system). More than other senses such as sight and hearing, touch and seem movement directly linked to emotions such as condition. And this portion of the brain is one of the most susceptible to "model", changes in neuronal structure, during the development of children . In numerous studies of laboratory animals deprived of tactile stimulation and motion have exhibited abnormal social and emotional behavior.

Harlow explained that the behavior of monkeys is simply caused by social isolation and deprivation not in a specific sense of neurobiological processes.

I began to suspect that the cerebellar-vestibular system was involved after a study by psychoanalysts William Mason and Gershon Berkson, who reported that when a garment "surrogate mother" not rocked a monkey infant, maternal deprivation syndrome not developed. To study this possibility, Robert Heath and Bernard Saltzburg medical school took Tulane University, the monkeys provided by Harlow, monkeys reared with extreme violence and extreme isolation, electrophysiological recordings, via electrodes implanted in the cerebellum and limbic regions. Bioelectric signals from these electrodes showed on screen Download "peak" abnormal, which was not seen in normal monkeys. The presence of the peak was also detected by a single computer analysis of EEG records from the scalp of these monkeys in the cerebellum and limbic regions.

much evidence was provided of the role of the cerebellum, in a study I did with AJBerman and Doreen Berman Veterans Administration Hospital in the Bronx in New York. Using

two violent monkeys Harlow, Berman surgery removed part of the outer layers of the cortex of the "old brain" (paleocerebellum region) in a monkey and the "new brain (neocerebellum region) in the other. The monkey with the injury in the "old brain" became much less violent, while the mono with the new brain injury not. This result makes sense: old brain cerebellum connected primarily to the emotional centers in the limbic system, while the new brain region connected primarily to the governing structures very highly neocortical brain processes.

Meanwhile, Austin Riese University of California, Riverside showed that l monkeys raised in isolation you have a larger difference in the branches of brain cells of somatosensory and motor cortex . And at the University of Illinois, Mary Wiliam Floeter and Greenough found that monkeys raised in colonies had more branches of brain cells in parts of the cerebellum that Esther monkeys reared in isolation or in pairs.

Thus the influence of environment seems to be printed in the structure of the brain, which in turn shapes the environment, (I call this proposal to study "ecobiology" of behavior to distinguish it from the socio- biology)

Moreover, cross-cultural studies have established a significant relationship between physical condition demonstrated in human infants and rates of violence among adults. In a study of 49 primitive cultures (3) , found that when levels of affection to the infant are low-and among the Comanches and Ashanti, the levels of violence are high ; where physical condition is high -as among the Maori of New Zealand and the Balinese-violence is low . also found that restrictions on premarital sexual involvement were associated with high violence.

The possible lesson to modern culture is clear. We seem to be suffering from failures in the family ties, reflected in everything from divorce rates of sex crime, alcoholism and drug abuse.

culture depends on our neurobiology, without a physical condition suitable environment, a harmonious society would not be possible.


Psichology Today
Reprinted from December 1979 James W. Prescott WAS
formerly Health Scientist Administrator, Developmental Biology Program Behaviohal. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Health.
March / April 1989

Translated by the author of this blog, original version, English _______________________________________________________________


Notes:

(1) psychoanalyst Elliott Barker section "The Brain" course "The Art of Parenting", clearly describes the brain damage occurs in creatures, for lack of affection or abuse.

(2) Harry Harlow was an American psychoanalyst who performed experiments with baby rhesus monkeys studied the impact of isolation and deprivation of the mother during the primal period.

(3) studies James W. Prescott were later confirmed 100%. The bulletin: body pleasure and the origins of violence , is published on its website .

"The correlation between lack bodily love in childhood and violence was shown by JWPrescott in 1975, and the correlation between the degree of sexual freedom for women (which is associated with primary love ) and the degree of violence. This study was conducted in 49 non-industrialized countries, Prescott obtaining a correlation of 98%, a further review of the study showed that Prescott was mistaken and that the correlation was 100%. This means that there is a zero percent chance that a human being from birth libidinally satisfied to be a violent person. This correlation has subsequently been found in neurological terms: first, it was found that l to formation of the neurological system from 14/16 weeks of gestation is not genetically patterned and depends on the libidinal relationship with the environment , and secondly, that adaptation of this system in training, you can either develop the capacity for empathy or the capacity for indifference and cruelty, by type creature's interaction with its environment . This is how neurologically has also proven that a freezing environment libidinal develops creatures prone to violence. (Casilda Rodrigáñez in Degeneration of the human race by the loss of their fundamental qualities )


sources of information

Video on the Origins of Violence

The qualities of the human creature

Female Sexuality

"maternal instinct or desire?

Patriarchate Project

The paradigm of women

Impact of Mother-Baby Separation

matricide and therapeutic status

Manifesto for the recovery of motherhood

Saturday, April 3, 2010

How To Lock The Bag Number

Alienation of Affection The roots of horror in the crib



by Alice Miller


There

in any dictator, murderer or terrorist, however daunting it is and without any exception, a child who was once severely beaten, and who, to survive, had to completely deny their feelings of utter helplessness . But this radical denial of the suffering endured behaved in an empty interior, and in many of these beings, an arrest of development of the innate capacity for compassion .

Destroying human life, including themselves, reduced to the state of emptiness, do not cause any problems.


Today we can find on the computer screens lesions in the brain of children destroyed care or private. Numerous articles in specialist brain research, among others Bruce D. Perry, who is also child psychologist, provide us with valuable information on this topic.


Contrary to what you believed until recently, we do not come into this world with a brain fully formed: it develops during the first years of life, and that one does to the child during this period, in good as in evil, often leaves indelible marks. Because our brain keeps the body and emotional memory, though, unfortunately! mental-not necessarily all that has happened . If the creature has, by his side, a person able to help, he learns to magnify what is known: the cruelty, brutality, hypocrisy and ignorance. Because the child only learns by imitation, and not absorb what you're looking to instill with beautiful well-intentioned words. Later, one that will be grown without support from someone that security will become an instigator of the massacres, mass death, the Mafia godfather or dictator, exercise, or help to carry on entire populations, once the will to power, the same terror that it met and personally suffered as a child.


Monday, January 18, 2010

Konad Where To Buy New York




"Humans are born to live, live and love as if they were the same thing. Affect is a fundamental need is the need makes us human. Hence, a person who has not been 'humanised' during the first six years of his life suffering from a process of dehumanization that leads them to destructive behaviors, learned in a messy and misguided attempt to adapt to a world too cluttered and provoking tension. Of these disorders arise all the aggressiveness and violent clashes at both individual and collective "
Ashley Montagu (The myth of human violence)



In the year 1986 at a UNESCO meeting in Seville, Spain, to mark the International Year of Peace, 19 scientists from India, Finland, Spain, Mexico, United States, Kuwait, United Kingdom , Germany, Russia, Australia, Poland and Kenya.
Belonging to different branches of science such as neurophysiology, psychology, ethology, social psychology, physical anthropology, psychiatry, biochemistry, psychobiology, animal behavior, biological anthropology, psychology, sociology.

signed the following (1) :



STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE


In the belief that it is our responsibility to speak out from our disciplines on the most dangerous and destructive activities of the species, violence and war, recognizing that science is a cultural product that can not be defined or cover everything, and grateful for the support sevillanas authorities and representatives of the English Committee of UNESCO; we the undersigned, scientists around the world and relevant science specialists have met and reached the following Statement on Violence. It put into question a number of alleged biological findings used even by some in our disciplines, to justify violence and war . Because these alleged findings have contributed to an atmosphere of pessimism in our time, we propose that this rejection abienrto and thought of such errors contribute significantly to the International Year of Peace.


Misuse of scientific theories and data as justification for violence and war is not new , but have occurred since the advent of modern science. For example, the theory of evolution has been used to justify not only war but also genocide, colonialism, and suppression of the weak .

formulate our proposal in the form of five proposals. We are aware that there are many other issues about violence and war which could be applied fruitfully in terms of our disciplines, but we confine ourselves here to what we regard as the first and most important step.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that we inherited from our animal ancestors tendency to make war . Although the fights are common in all animal species, few cases of destruction among species organized groups are known and none includes the use of tools developed as weapons. The predators that normally feed on other species could not be equated with violence in the species. War is a peculiar human phenomenon and does not occur among the other animals .

The fact that the war has changed so radically over time indicates that it is a product of culture. Its biological connection takes place essentially through language, which allows the coordination of groups, transfer of technology and tools. War is biologically possible, but inevitable, as evidenced by its variations in time and in space. There are cultures that have waged war for hundreds of years and there are others who have engaged in frequent struggles times and not others.


IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that war or other violent behavior are genetically programmed into our human nature . While genes affect all levels Nervis system function, providing a potential development that can only be updated jointly by the ecological and social environment. While the individual varies in their predisposition to be affected by his experience, is the interaction between their genetic endowment and rearing conditions which determine their personality . Except for rare pathologies, the genes do not produce individuals necessarily predisposed to violence. Do they determine otherwise. While genes are involved with each other to establish our performance capabilities, do not determine the outcome for themselves.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that in the course of human evolution has been a selection of aggressive behavior more than other behaviors . In all well-studied species, status within the group is achieved with the ability to cooperate and fulfill social functions relevant to the structure of that group.
The "dominance" implies social ties and affiliations, it is not simply a matter of possession and use of greater physical strength, although it involves aggressive behavior. Where genetic selection for aggressive behavior has been imposed artificially in animals, has quickly produced hyper-aggressive individuals, indicating that the attack was not selected the most natural conditions.
When such hyper-aggressive animals, created experimentally are in a social group, or disrupt its social structure or are thrown out of it. Violence is our evolutionary legacy nor in our genes.

IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that humans possess a "violent brain" . While we have the nervous system able to act violently, it is not automatically activated by external or internal stimuli. As higher primates, but unlike other animals, our higher neural processes, filter such stimuli before they are made. There is nothing in our neurophysiology that compels us to react violently .


IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that war has its origins in the 'instinct' or any other motivation simple. The emergence of modern warfare has been a journey from the primacy of emotional and motivational factors, sometimes called "instincts" - to the primacy of cognitive factors. Modern war involves institutional use of personal caracaterísticas such as obedience, suggestibility or idealism, social skills like language, and rational considerations such as cost estimates, planning and reporting process. technology of modern war has exaggerated traits associated with violence, both in training fighters in the preparation of support for the war among the general population. As a result of this exaggeration, such features often are interpreted as causes and consequences of the process not as .

conclude
saying that biology does not condemn humanity to war, and that humanity can be freed from the bondage of biological pessimism and now equipped with the confidence necessary to perform the processing tasks required in this International Year of Peace and the years come. Although these tasks are mainly institutional and collective, also based in the consciousness of individual participants for whom pessimism and optimism are essential. As "wars begin in the minds of men ', peace also begins in our minds. The same species who invented war is capable of inventing peace. The responsibility lies with each one of us.

Seville, May 16, 1986



LIST Scientists subscribers


David Adams, Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown (CT), U.S.. SA Barnett, Ethology. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

NPBETCHEREVA, Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad, USSR.

Bonnie Frank Carter, Psychology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia (PA), U.S..

Joseph M. Rodriguez Delgado, Neurophysiology, Center for Neurobiological Studies, Madrid, Spain

Andrzej Eliasz, Single Differences Psychology. Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. SANTIAGO

GENOVES, Biological Anthropology, Institute of Anthropological Studies, Mexico City, Mexico. JOSE LUIS DIAZ

, Ethology, Mexican Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.

E. BENSON GINSBURG, Behavioral Genetics, University of Connecticut, Storr (CT), USA. JO

Groebel, Social Psychology, Errziehungswissens-chaftliche Hochschule, Landau, Germany.

-SAMIR KUMAR GHOSH, Sociology, Indian Institute of Human Sciences, Calcutta, India.

Robert Hinde, Animal Behavior, University of Cambridge, UK.
RICHARD E.
LEAKEY, Physical Anthropology, National Museum of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. TAH

H. MALAYSIA, Psychiatry, University of Kuwait

MARTIN J. RAMIREZ, Psychobiology, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.

Federico Mayor Zaragoza, Biochemistry, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain. DIANA L.

MENDOZA, Etiology, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.

Ashis Nandy, Political Psychology, Center for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi, India.

JOHN PAUL SCOTT, Animal Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green (OH), USA. Riitta

Walstrom, Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

English Original: English Translation of the Commission.


----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Notes
:

(1 ) Retrieving Information from Texts Casilda Rodrigáñez Bustos.


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Why Do I Have Fat Knees

STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE qualities of human beings (2 / 2)




" All discussions about the issue of whether man is good or bad, whether it is a social or antisocial, are in fact philosophical pursuits. That man is a social or a protoplasmic mass irrational reactions, depending on whether their basic biological needs are in harmony or in conflict with the institutions that it has created "Wilhelm Reich


regard to the treatment of the creatures, evil- treatment is given (see Part 1 ) mayormermente by misinformation, ignorance of the qualities of human beings . In a recent article (A) Rodrigáñez Casilda mention of this ignorance, I copy a paragraph of this interesting article:

".... I think the vast majority have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe qualities and innate goodness of man (the basic conceptual dogma in the collective unconscious). And I say this because if people had no idea it would its treatment of their children, if I had idea of \u200b\u200btheir qualities, rather than give orders and set limits, would facilitate the means for expansion of their desires and their strict limits for children today, in the suffocating under nuclear family, not as consumers and slaves of the new Orwellian society. I think people do not know what a human being and therefore is dedicated to feeling fresh. And does not know, it is clear that the vitality subtracting their children, is building artificial design of fascist rule ...."

The second part of this interesting explanation, the same writer, on the qualities of all human beings, when we are creatures , which we lose as we grow in the hostile environment in which we socialize:

The qualities of the human creature


For Casilda Rodrigáñez

Excerpt from " Sexuality and performance of dominance "


Now we have lost the sense of human brotherhood and the innate goodness of the creature. Such concepts sound like us more or less utopian proclamations, political or religious. But as I said Kropotkin (2) , there was a time when there was no politics or religion or knew the fratricide. Fraternity and mutual aid was a way of life of mankind, which was maintained for millennia, and some called 'old happy', or 'holy old' or 'golden age', others' silver age ', others' companies mother-law 'because it was governed by maternal, others' matristic'; matrifocal or matricentric, in which old mother had this that said Lope, who lives as to postpone .

Boockhin Murray (9) ensures that the voice oldest to describe the concept of freedom 'is amaryi , a Sumerian expression means return to the mother, adding that reference surely to that freedom had existed only in society matricentric. The concept of 'freedom' appeared in human consciousness when it appeared the repression could not appear before, it is not possible, the concept of 'freedom' if there is no repression.

The concept of 'freedom' thus makes reference to the recovery of something lost, a life without Suppression of matricentric societies, whose memory was still present in the memory of the Sumerian civilization.

The existence of the Golden Age is mentioned not one, not two, but in many ancient literary works that speak of this era of mankind, and if not recognized academically because it is neither known nor for lack of evidence (10) . As we said in the first part of Rise Oedipus The assault Hade s also archeology (11) has unearthed thousands of Neolithic sites, which show clear evidence, both for its quantity by the evidence of their content, culture and art that some have called a celebration of life. (12), it actually recreated life showing the absence of relations of domination and wars among its inhabitants, a world inhabited by these authors say, not the homo sapiens, but homo ludens, as is the expression of well-being and bienaventauranza offering their art and architecture of their villages and towns.

Their culture expressed the wisdom of nature (especially the wisdom body), which is the wisdom of the self in life, and that is true wisdom to serve the welfare and wildlife conservation. The experience accumulated over a generation transmitting to the next orally. So wisdom is to culture, to cultivate the desire of being the group that was not 'prejudiced', 'troubled' or 'persecuted' by other interests other than the well-being, as at present, that all knowledge is censored, to that lies not unveiled, and polluted by the interest to make gains and build wealth. Wisdom was not in books but in human bodies, customs, art, in the same relations of brotherhood. With growing age the accumulated wisdom, the experience made and received from other persons, and therefore respected and revered the elderly. No, is not a proclamation to go back, but to fill books and media of the true wisdom of the self and human welfare.

As Antony Hopkins says in the movie Instinct , this is not a formal primitive, or return to the pre-industrial or pre-technological, or to destroy the cities be destroyed only one thing domination. Without a domain, the wisdom of the self would place the entire industry, all technology, all economic systems. For example, no relationship of authority and domination by medical professionals, the mutual desire between mother and child would be strictly respected, not violate the mark, and medicine and the technology would come in their proper place, as we see in documentaries Nils Bergman (13) in which shows how to supply oxygen to premature babies and serum lying cheek to cheek on the mother's bare torso. Nad it is not difficult or complicated, it is the simple sea.

Before anything else, domination is materially breach of the self life.

In pre-patriarchal times, aware of the ability of self and body wisdom, would have laughed if it had appeared an expert tell them to be taught to eat or sleep for a child or a woman to give birth.

is no doubt that medicine has discovered and launched some very important ways that can help save life and to freedom at any given time. But what happens is that on behalf of the eventual salvation, self-regulation is blocked and the wisdom body, mix which heals and saves us, making us sick and killing us, and often intervenes on behalf of the causing a disease prevention and that there was a risk, as is being recognized and with respect to motherhood and parenting. The failure of self-regulation of motherhood and childhood has been and remains the pillar of society of domination.

human creatures have an almost infinite desire to know and an ability to learn for themselves that would exceed the imagination of pedagogy @ l @ s, and the culture of domination can not accept, either in theory or in practice. That is why the creatures are systematically hostile environment to develop their qualities. As stated Liedloff (14) to begin lack confidence in the environment (emotional reciprocity) to move and improve their psychomotor apparatus through experience, without trust in the environment, the creature does not dare to experiment, or makes it much more slowly, in Instead, the creatures of the Amazon rainforest not retract their innate confidence because I never have lacked the maternal body, reach a soreprendente autonomy long before those of our Western society (15) .


Zerzan (16) also provides data in this regard and said that small 'Kung studied by Ainsworth (1967) showed a marked precocity in the development of the early cognitive and motor skills . He attributed the exercise and stimulation of a freedom of movement without restriction and the high degree of warmth and closeness between parents' and children Kung . (See also Konner 1976). Elaborating on this, adding that Zerzan feed children receive much more care, time and attention than the isolated nuclear families civilization. He also cites a surprising finding of Duffy (1984): all children of a camper Mbuti father called all men and all women mother . Also at Post and Taylor (1984) which described "almost permanent contact" with their mothers and other adults that Bushman children enjoy .


Physical security not achieved continuously monitor and inhibiting the action of the creature, but maintaining the respect, affection and trust reciprocity of the creature in the environment after birth. As I said Françoise Dolto (17) , the so-called natural overprotection leaves them vulnerable to the creatures because it prevents and slows learning. And we say 'bad llamada'sobreprotección because it protects itself is never wrong, nor can it be excessive it is bad when behind the protection that is in real domination and disrespect for self-development of the creatures. There is a direct relationship between the Palamós / repression that inhibits the action of the creature itself (Domination), and vulnerability:


Inhibition of the action ----> delay in learning --- -----> vulnerability


An equation that would be known in order to change the general attitude of all mothers and fathers control so literally suffocating his creatures, interfering with their own development, attitude, in part due to the unknown qualities of the human creature and its way of development, and therefore wrongly deployed the necessary legitimate desire to protect them.


Dolto reads: This side sleep imagination without power, the creativity that grows in the desert, and the whole problem is to prevent the choking adults.


The inhibition mechanism of action studied by French physician Henri Laborit (18) Michel Odent and collected in any of his texts (19) , explains what happens neurologically when aggression is impossible to respond either by fighting or by fleeing (Laborit) and no other alternative than submission and resignation .... (B)


People who have lived in peace with their sons and daughters, not the typical permanent war (war given by children is a popular term), they know from experience that the human creature is good, generous, detached, you want the happiness and welfare of their loved ones, which relies heavily on them until they are repeatedly betrayed the trust that originally she leaves us, that has an almost infinite desire learning knowledge and ready to deploy, and always carried a few or many media and freedom at its disposal, that want to develop your life and follow their impulses, take initiative and make decisions about things that the incumbent, which is capable Of all the complications and sacrifices for their elders and their brothers and sisters, that is complacent, which is full of love and libidinal energy, and rejects as much as mastering be mastered, because when a child grows their own initiative being respected, it is also respectful of dem @ s. The creature is not forced into the spiral of war of domination, then it is patient, understanding, respectful, imaginative, spontaneous, curious, witty, loves the truth and not lie, it sees no other way of relating that of transparency. And that is, until you lose confidence and with her innocence.


When we realize that it is not, then we started cornering qualities of our primary integrity that we are useless, and to provide resistance to what flows from within us, we shrug and we tightened. So we began to disconnect from our instincts to start building battleships and ego, identity, personality, according to the rules of the world (inhibition, mistrust, deception, blackmail, lying, hoarding, dominance, submission, competition) that are distinct from 'rules' of life in full primary (drive, desire, initiative, curiosity, confidence, cascading, indulgence, generosity, satisfaction, reciprocity, transparency). The little man learns from its environment autoinhibirse, lying, to submit and to master, and learns that lying, submission and domination are the way to survive. And when the human creature acquires the experience that lies, submission and domination is what works, leaving behind the 'golden age' of innocence and integrity of the human condition, learn that subject is annoyed, and that annoyed not have to annoy the neighbors, that is not to be dominated dominate ... ... (B)


From our current perspective absence welfare, welfare is a goal, as Jean Liedloff (14) , something to look. However, welfare is the primary and normal state of the creature, the feeling that accompanies self-regulation is therefore something that we lost and we must search for and retrieve. And this notion of something perdido'la found in the lost paradise of myths of origins. Wellness is normal mood of the human creature, to which add joy, joy, tenderness, passion and pleasure. The concept of 'felicidad'que have is a longing for that state and its consequences.


Our concept of a concept felicidad'es erratic, because it rests in the state of bliss of self-regulation of our genuine psychosomatic integrity, and leads us to be constantly in search state what we have neither. From the ego, happiness is a search erratic, wishful thinking, because the competition, hoarding, inhibition of action (submission), domination, that is what the ego is constituted, do not produce well, and in the search erratic, joy, joy, passion and pleasure are illusions that make their way to escape from reality (hence the success of drugs) or fade like ghosts, the closer we seem to them.


Mothers and fathers of our society think that the happiness of their children's social success depends on reaching, and so educate them to develop the 'intelligence fratricidal' learn to compete and win every potential competition. But the happiness of any human being does not depend on social success we achieve in this world, but the capaidad develop life to love her, that is, to live in an environment of reciprocity, in which the spill to work, and in which the hypercomplex set of systems that form the body can regulate itself, and this develop and flourish capacity to love is exactly what remains committed to the suppression of maternal desire, repression of infantile sexuality and education fratricidal ... (B)


(9) MURRAY BOOCHKIN, societé a refaire Joins , Atelier de Création Libertaire, Lyon

(10) According ANDRES ORTIZ OSÉS ( keys symbolic of our culture, Anthropos, Barcelona 1933) in the Homeric hymns, in the Orphic writings, in the last period of Aeschylus and Hesiod's work , there is sufficient material to understand the pre-patriarchal society, also in Metamorphoses Ovid , apart from references to the Golden Age, etc. of the classics of our Golden Age of ancient literature they read in the original versions in Greek or Latin, another source is the study of some contemporary peoples antrpológicos

(11) Eg see the work of archaeologists like Marija Gimbutas and James MELAART .
This theme is developed in Chapter 2 of The Assault on Hades.

(12) Jordi Pigem Pe, The Civilization of the Goddess: the religion of nature in ancient Europe, Integral Journal no. 1042. And NICHOLAS PLATON, Crete ed. Youth, 1974. See chap. 2, The Assault on Hades .

(13) Rediscover the way natural and Restoring the original paradigm , NILS & JILL BERGMAN production, 2001. www.kangaroomothercare.com.

(14) Jean Liedloff, The Continuum concept, Ob Stare, 2003.

(15) Dr. Marcelle Geber in in 1958 did a study in Uganda of 308 creatures bred 'old-fashioned' ( suckled at its discretion, carried in constant proximity with the mother, sharing the same bed ) and compared creatures with a group of European ( fed by bottle, pushed in carts, away from their parents at night ... ). The conclusion was that African creatures developed their motor skills and intellectual to begin earlier during the first year (Quoted by Carlos Fresneda in emotional roots of intelligence, World 09/22/2003).

(16) JHON Zerzan, Future Primitive , Numa Ediciones, Valencia 2001. Pags 30-31. See Note 6 on page 18 of this book.

(17) FRANÇOISE DOLTO, La cause des enfants, Robert Laffont, coll. Le Livre de Poche, Paris 1985.

(18) Henri Laborit, L'inhibition de l'action , Masson 1980. See note (6) of the Introduction.

(19) Michel Odent, The end of the murder of Christ? View Note (4) of the Introduction
collectors, as cited by Zerzan (note 5 of the introduction) .. ______________________________________________________________


Notes:

(A) Related article, highly recommended:
degeneration of the human race by the loss of their fundamental qualities Rodrigáñez by Casilda. (Nov. 2009)

(B) The integrity of the text " The qualities of the human creature " are on pages 27-51 of the book of Casilda Rodrigáñez "Sexuality and Domination operation "

The qualities of human being (half) ---------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Related articles:

Female Sexuality

"maternal instinct or desire?

Patriarchate Project

Alienation of affection

The paradigm of women

Impact of Mother-Baby Separation

matricide and therapeutic status

Manifesto for the recovery of motherhood